Talk:Core class

Notes section does not make sense
The Notes section of the article has several sentences that appear to be mangled:
 * 'The sorcerer from the World of Warcraft RPG was replaced in the World of Warcraft by the arcanist and mage class.'
 * 'The wizard from the World of Warcraft RPG was replaced in the World of Warcraft RPG by the arcanist and mage.'
 * 'The healer from the Warcraft RPG was replaced in the Warcraft RPG by a new type of healer (and its druid, priest, and shaman class paths).'
 * 'The witch doctor core class from the World of Warcraft RPG replaced the witch doctor from the Warcraft RPG.'

The first sentences state that World of Warcraft RPG content was replaced by World of Warcraft content. Is this referring to the MMO?

The second sentence states that World of Warcraft RPG content was replaced by World of Warcraft RPG content. This does not make sense, as a book can not be replaced by itself.

The third sentence states that Warcraft RPG content was replaced by Warcraft RPG content, which is the same problem as the second sentence, but with a different sentence replacing iteself.

The forth sentence seems to be referring to the witch doctor PrC, but that is not stated.

Please could someone who is familiar with this content review this section and find out what it should be saying. Thanks. David Shepheard (talk) 02:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)