Template talk:Patches

Chinese-only patches
As they applied only to Chinese translations and therefore weren't released in non-Chinese regions (and have no English wiki page), should 2.0.9, 2.0.11, and 2.1.4 perhaps be removed from this template? It's a little confusing for them to be present and unlinked while 2.0.0 and 2.0.2 are missing entirely if one hasn't actually gone and researched the patches. 02:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * If we know about the patches (USA release or not) they should be here -- People make mistakes and miss things on ocasion - if you see a missing patch add it in (just do so proplerly is all that is asked). -- 16:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

New template design (if you like)
If you like this - copy it over -- 16:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Moved to Forum:Template: Patches - new design

Most recent patch
I just reverted Howbitzer editing for italicized the most recent patch. Please don't revert it again, you shouldn't have favoritism over the most recent patch. The largest number "3.2.0" is already self-explanatory. --Ramu50 (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Italicized has always meant not yet implemented. -- 03:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As a side note, it's an abbreviation for "bizarre" (biz+R). 6:35 PM, 29 Jul 2009 (EDT)

Suggestion
Just a simple suggestion: A "current patch status" group that lists the current builds on the Live, Public, and Beta realms. For example:


 * Live Realms: 4.0.1a·Public Test Realm: 4.0.3·Closed Beta: 4.0.3a

When PTR or Beta isn't available, it could simply say "closed" or "N/A". Suzaku (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)