Talk:Kel'Thuzad (lore)

Anyone notice how in the "After the War" section, there's a spot with five lines all beginning with Kel'Thuzad? Not that there's anything wrong with it, but it just look really odd. Maybe a bit of rewording could fix that. Pzychotix 03:04, 18 July 2006 (EDT)

Kel'Thuzad in Caverns of Time
From leaked screenshots of TBC it appears that players can meet young Kel'Thuzad during first adventure into Caverns of Time. He stands around in Southshore. Any idea what is he doing there? --Potbasher 09:47, 25 October 2006 (EDT)
 * Oh, could really well be. From what I've seen, there are talks about the Ashbringer being made in Tarren Mill by Turalyon, Morgraine and Co... The whole place is just one big "Got leet lore? Put it here!" -instance. I'll try to check on Kel'Thuzad for you, though. It's probably when he was still human (like in Road to Damnation). --Tinkerer 09:53, 25 October 2006 (EDT)

Gag Quotes
Are those fanmade, or from WC3?--Ragestorm 16:46, 2 November 2006 (EST)
 * They were the extra unit sounds Kel'Thuzad made in Warcraft III. Although I don't get the "I shall await my eternal reward" reference, so I'm not sure if that's a gag quote or not. 19:34, 14 November 2006 (EST)


 * It's safe to assume that one's real. Liches are almost immortal. --Ragestorm 20:12, 14 November 2006 (EST)


 * I know it's real. I just don't know what it's a reference to, or what the joke is in order to include it with the gags. ::Reads up on pop culture.:: 20:41, 14 November 2006 (EST)


 * No, I mean I think it was one of his actual lines. If you were a necromancer worshipping the king of undeath, doesn't that sound like the sort of thing you'd say?--Ragestorm 20:43, 14 November 2006 (EST)


 * It might've been both a unit sound and a cinematic line. Blizzard sometimes did that. It's a good excuse to play that campaign again. 15:55, 15 November 2006 (EST)

Undead Lich
Ragestorm is right of course. It is redundant. When you discuss a lich, its automatically known its undead, LOL.Baggins 13:04, 8 December 2006 (EST)
 * ::Chuckles.:: Yes, this is true. Looks fine now. 17:21, 8 December 2006 (EST)