User talk:Smakbunny

Again, welcome! -- 09:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Elinks
I highly suggest you read WW:EL. Bump your links again and you risk having them ALL removed. 05:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I will reiterate this. Either read and heed it, or risk losing the links to said sites. --Sky (t · c · w) 04:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

- Alright I have read through the WW:EL and looked for anything which may be a violation of rules. If you can point me to any potential rule violations/link bumps that may have been posted, please do so and I will fix them ASAP. I cannot recall posting any links that would violate any rules, or bumping any links, so please help me understand where things may have gone wrong. -Smakbunny 13:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I will not post specifics, as I would like you to review your contributions for specific instances. However...


 * You were moving, or adding, "Raidguru" links to sitting just beneath the various elinks templates. Raidguru, in most cases, was moved from a position of alphabetical order to one of not being in alphabetical order. The links themselves were not against the rules, but that is. Thanks for leaving a message here. --Sky (t · c · w) 23:31, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for informing me of this Sky. I did not mean to violate rules or policies but merely linked things as such when adding my site's icon in that manner as it was the easiest way for me to do so. It doesn't matter to me personally if they are at the top, middle or bottom in order.  Simply stated, I could see the npc-template the easiest and know that my link code below that point, and just inserted it there.  I gurantee that I will place my links at the bottom from now on and was totally unaware of any particular sorting method.

Quick question though, am I supposed to drop the links in an alphabetical order, or am I suppoed to insert them at the bottom in a chronological fashion? If you know the answer, that would help my greatly in the future Smakbunny 02:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Alphabetic, as specified in WW:EL -- k _d3 02:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright, now I know. In the future drop them in Alphabetical order and all will be good.  Thanks for the help guys! Smakbunny 16:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. Thanks for being cooperative! --Sky (t · c · w) 22:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)