Talk:Post-hooking a function safely

Is there a valid reason that this isn't using hooksecurefunc in the "safe" method? It should operate precisely the same way, with the added note of not tainting code. Given that it talks about safely hooking **Blizzard** code, it would be logical that hooksecurefunc would be the appropriate hook method to use, not creating your own hook directly.

If nobody has any objections, I'm going to adjust this page to reflect that. Shirik 17:02, 16 March 2007 (EDT)


 * hooksecurefunc is not cheap, and should only be used when tainting is going to be an issue. Don't change what's already given in the page, but by all means add a section about safe and secucer hooking  21:53, 16 March 2007 (EDT)