Forum:New Feral Druid form? (Ideas...)

Wouldn't it be grand if we could have a new form for the top tiers of the Feral Druid Talent Tree? There's Cat form for DPS, Bear form for Tanking, now we can have a hybrid form that can tank AND DPS. I think it should look like a Sasquatch with big husky fur for the bear and long sharp claws and teeth for the cat form; and of course should walk on two feet. It'll be kind of like the Felguard of the Warlock Demonology Tree. Besides, the other two trees get cool new forms, why not the Feral tree as well? Ruukvale (talk) 18:19, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * No...besides, Feral already has two forms while the other trees each have only one. -- 18:26, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree. I'd rather see new forms for Balance and Resto before yet another Feral form. -- Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 10:45 PM PST 26 Oct 2009


 * Believe I already deleted this before... These forums are not for suggestions for the game. 19:16, October 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, so you deleted it did you? My apologies, I had thought it was lost somewhere through comp problems. I won't bring this up again. (Pcj, the other trees are each given an additional form, the tree and the moonkin, whereas feral receives no additional forms, this was what i was arguing about. But pay this no heed at any rate.)
 * Ruukvale (talk) 21:07, October 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * "These forums are not for suggestions for the game."
 * Since when? Game suggestions are no worse than all the lore speculation that litters the forums. Now if you want to propose a forum policy, please do. That said, game suggestions are more effective on the official forums. -- Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 10:43 PM PST 26 Oct 2009


 * I wrote down some reasons forum topics were getting deleted when the forums first came out at WoWWiki:What WoWWiki is not. The first part comes from Forum:Forums too forumy.-- 23:00, October 26, 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I figured the same reasoning as to why ideas/suggestions for the game were removed from the village and warcraft pumps would apply here as well, but whatever. 00:30, October 27, 2009 (UTC)


 * The forums are a totally different structure from the pumps. Also, updating WoWWiki:What WoWWiki is not without discussing it with the community seems more like imposing your opinion. I won't revert it however, since I'm an inclusionist, where some people seem to be exclusionist. -- Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 5:02 PM PST 27 Oct 2009


 * More on Forum:What should the forums be for?.-- 21:48, October 27, 2009 (UTC)