Talk:Zone/Archive01

Zone debate
Wiki-Writers: Please see this post about the relation of zones, regions, areas, etc. (Updated 5/20/05)
 * My reading of this debate was that it was decided that 'zone' and 'region' are used interchangeably by Blizzard, so I'm echoing that here.--Aeleas 14:47, 17 March 2006 (EST)

=Votes=

Delete

 * 1) --Anticrash 13:24, 22 Dec 2005 (EST)

Keep

 * 1) Fandyllic 11:46 PM PST 22 Dec 2005
 * 2) CJ 07:31, 23 Dec 2005 (EST)
 * 3) &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined 21:21, 31 Dec 2005 (EST)

=Comments=
 * 1) Redundant and unnecessary. --Anticrash 13:24, 22 Dec 2005 (EST)
 * 2) Can you explain exactly why? Redundant with what? --Fandyllic 11:46 PM PST 22 Dec 2005
 * 3) Still in use Category:Sub-Zone CJ 07:31, 23 Dec 2005 (EST)
 * 4) Redundant because this article is BLANK. Refer to Category:Zone. We do not need this page when we have that one. --Anticrash 09:36, 23 Dec 2005 (EST)
 * 5) Well, it used to have content (see old version), but then FeldmanSkitzoid made it a redirect to Category:Zone. A redirect is not blank. I would like to put back the old definition, but it should at least be a redirect to something that explains what "zone" means. --Fandyllic 12:21 PM PST 25 Dec 2005
 * 6) Should be a redirect - *NEVER* put the delete template on a redirect page; if you wish to delete it, but the template on the *TALK* page, not the page itself. I removed the template from the redirect; the vote is still open however, until we get 5 for or 5 against. --  &#8465;ilver&#167;&#8465;ide|undefined 21:21, 31 Dec 2005 (EST)