User talk:ParatwaSS

Again, welcome!  --Kirkburn (talk)

Settableall
Please see Template talk:Settableall. I can revrrt back to your changes if it gets support and reasoning :) 12:35, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

I worked on the Slovene, Italian and us Wikipedia for several years, but for some months now I'm not active anymore, mostly because of WoW sucking away my free time. I registered here to make some small fixes, and I ended editing some class-sets templates, whick took me several hours to complete.

Apparently you can't do that here, you need to "discuss" about expanding content on some obscure template-talk-page, and if you don't.... they revert all your work. How nice.

Well that is not fun anymore, so please consider this account closed.

ooh... Kirkburn even reverted my own talk page... talk about provocation, I guess he can't be more explicit than this; no worries I wont touch the wiki ever again, I promise; you can keep this nazi-wiki-crap all for yourself, o mighty admin --ParatwaSS 13:43, 18 April 2007 (EDT)


 * Methinks you should check the page history? I added your comment back. 13:45, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 * It was me who reverted your comments because I thought at first sight they were flaming against this user. BTW, the aggressive silliness doesn't help it. -- 13:50, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

I apologise to Kirkburn, I saw wrong.

As per "aggressive silliness"... you revert my own talk page and I am the agressive one? I just removed the welcome tag and a simple link to a discussion elsewhere... what was there to revert, anyway...

Look, my idea was simply to contribute to the wiki. I contributed to a few pages about tailoring and then stumbled into the class templates. There was no discussion on the subtemplates, there was only a suggestion on the main template to add the BC icon, which I did. In my experience on the wikipedia, any suggestions usually just sit there until someone acts, so instead of proposing "someone" should expand, I just did that. I figured that if the result was not of anyone's liking, then they should have edited it, shortened, whatever, or simply discussed (yes I periodically check), I would have gladly re-edited. When you chopped all my work I overreacted, because I don't really like people reverting instead of reediting.

Later on I realized you are an administrator. So probably I just clashed into some unwritten policies. Ok, my fault. In my defense, having those policies (don't edit templates) somewhere would have helped.

But then Adys come, and reverted my own page. This really went overboard. I managed to get reverted TWICE by TWO DIFFERENT admins in the same day, and I wasn't even vandalizing anything (well maybe you disagree). Now that the top 2 admins have me on their radar, I don't really see how could I add anything to the wiki without clashing with you two. Clearly my ways are not compatible with how things work on this wiki.

Probably going so strong on noobs like me is the proper way to deal with a game-wiki. Maybe this wiki is ment to be edited by eager but behaving 15-year old kids alone. Go spank them, by all means. Shame I'm not a kid and I don't need parenting.

I will still of course use your wiki daily, as it is a remarkable resource for me and for my guild on Shadowsong (hence my nick, BTW). --ParatwaSS 14:50, 18 April 2007 (EDT) (see? I remembered to sign, this time)


 * We're sorry for your experience. The problem was, when your change was made, it was large and had far-reaching consequences which I had a couple of, I guess you could say, complaints about. The reversion was just to restore it back to the original style so that a consensus for improvement could be reached as the change was obviously a bit controversial. I'm open to changing it back, but it'll probably have to be shortened (somehow?) for simplicity's sake. I hope this helps clarify things a bit? 15:35, 18 April 2007 (EDT)