Talk:Lamia

A lot of different things in the Art of WoW have shown up... It's interesting to see if Lamia's will. ~ Lordrayken

Pure speculation on my part, but I think the lamia are the uncorrupted versions of the proud.Tweak the Whacked 05:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * How come "some people" got mad when I made some articles from terms in the book, but then Lamia and other articles are okay? I was "told" to add them here instead which is hypocritical. Rolandius [[Image:Paladin.gif|25px]] ( talk -  contr ) 08:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I believe its cause you didn't just create one or two.... you were giving everything a page... that's when you really started getting all the admins attention. 08:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, but does that mean if I had created only one or two of those it would have been okay? Rolandius [[Image:Paladin.gif|25px]] ( talk -  contr ) 08:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Possibly. 08:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I thought it wasn't allowed because of the whole "conceptional" part of it. If so, then Lamia is pretty conceptional also. Rolandius [[Image:Paladin.gif|25px]] ( talk -  contr ) 10:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I'm a D&D fanatic.
OBJECTION! To the thingy in general. Lamia, in first creation, were not lion-centaurs. Rather, while they did have centaurish bodies, Lamia originally had the upper half of a female and would lure the target with charms, drain their wisdom/spirit to lowest poitn, and eat them.--Leo And his beloved lynx, Firestorm 02:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * K... well this isn't D&D. 06:26, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I already know that. I just hate it when I see a D&D monster's name with the monster itself drastically changed. I'll likely rant like this anytime it happens. Just ignore me. Very sorry!--Leo And his beloved lynx, Firestorm 03:28, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lamias didn't originate with D&D: -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 03:29, October 14, 2010 (UTC)