Talk:Wolvar

I thought the Wolvar were a faction of Worgen... thats the way it sounded to me when reading the interviews. 19:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you have a better cite?-- 19:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Argh... I guess not. 19:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * That screenshot definitely seems likely that it what they look like. Maybe they are a faction of 'good' Worgen that were affected by Sholazar Basin. The larger murloc concept art on the WotLK page is probably a Oracle also. I will ask Rushster later on if he just misheard they are trolls since every other site says they are wolves. *Edit* Worldofwar.net editted their article to say wolverine people instead of trolls. I guess it was just a misttype.  Leviathon (talk) 20:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Worgen are suposed to be an alien species to Azeroth. However, considering that there are several animal-like races on Azeroth, perhaps the Wolvar is the true Azerothian wolf-race, rather than an offspring race of the Worgen. Or, who knows, maybe the Worgen aren't aliens at all, but creatures from the very distant past. --Richeron (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I think I saw a screen shot of these 'wolvar' somewhere, if what I saw were wolvar they actually have the same basic model as furbolgs only with more wolverine like looks rather then bears. --Saphiredragon89 (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The current screenshots of the Franzyheart tribe in Worldofraids show a race very different from the Worgen. They are like humanoid wolverines, not humanoid wolves, and I think they are using the gnoll model as a base, rather than a Worgen or Furbolg one.--Morgaur (talk) 20:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Ya Worgen are from another dimension. Maybe Worgs. I think they are closer to wolverines though or else they would have been called Worgar not Wolvar.    Rolandius [[Image:Wc3Knight.gif|16x16px]] ( talk  -  contr ) 15:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Anybody else notice that they use the same animations as furlbogs? Maybe they are distant cousins of them? Im just throwing out ideas here of course. they dont use the gnoll model btw. All of them are currently using the models that share furlbog animations.--Whitedragon254 (talk) 19:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * If the Wolvar are some kind of "wolverine people" than I don't think they are related to furbolgs since furbolgs are more like bear creatures, like the Pandaran look like bear creatures. If the Wolvar are just being described as "looking like wolverines" than maybe they could be related to furbolgs somehow.    Rolandius [[Image:Paladin.gif|25x25px]] ( talk  -  contr ) 01:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

They do use edited furbolg animations but don't look too into that as it's just a shortcut Blizzard took. Leviathon (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's far from uncommon for different creature types to use the same animation sets. For example, Forsaken/skeletons/wretched all use the same animations, and the Twin Emperors use male night elf animations. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * True, as i said it was just an idea i was throwing out there. Also you can notice they have tails. I think furbolgs have tails but little stumpy ones. I try not to look back there xD. Just anthor short cut blizzard took like you said.--Whitedragon254 (talk) 02:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Finally, wolverine people! My dreams have come true! Wolverines are one of my favorite animals. My guess is that the Wolvar are related to the wolverine ancient that died in The War of the Ancients, just as Furbolgs are related to Ursol and Ursoc, and quillboar are related to Agamaggan. But no duh. --Mesethusela (talk) 05:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

More like racoon then wolverine?
Uhhh...anyone else think they look more like racoons then wolverines? With the tails and their "masks". Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 03:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 09:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)