User talk:Blitzme99

Removing yourself from vandal list
Please don't do this. Removing yourself from the list is an act of vandalism. I've looked at your changes and they aren't obviously vandalism to me, so I've changed you to a suspect. I will talk to Gourra and ask him for specifics on why he listed you. -- Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 4:16 PM PST 15 Jun 2008

Page Vashj.
You are a vandal.

You have tried to remove the guilds.

Cataclysm & Bacon

And other this will be reported.

Furean (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Blitzme99, you have been added as a vandal for at least 4 acts of removing content without explanation. You obviously know how use a wiki, so I expect an explanation in the next few days or I'll have to ban you.
 * I'm giving you a few days, because you have done alot of work on Server:Vashj US that has not been complained about or obvious vandalism previously. Don't waste your opportunity. --[[Image:gengar orange 22x22.png]] Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 3:14 PM PST 12 Aug 2008


 * I made it clear in the following posts on the vashj forums that I was removing a number of guilds for not being active participants in 25 man raiding.


 * http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=8765779360&postId=87646115046&sid=1#0


 * http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=7116543022&sid=1&pageNo=6


 * You will notice that the guild Cataclysm and Bacon are both on the list of guilds for the server, but they are not involved in 25 man raiding and so cannot be considered active members of that list.


 * I gave Furean several oppurtunities to show proof that they have downed a 25 man boss, but so far those attempts have failed.


 * I did recieve permission from members of the guild Bacon for removing them from the progression list.


 * Both times I have been reported as a vandal on this site, it as been by guild leaders who do not understand the nature of the progression charts. I do not hold it against them, but I do feel as though I am wasting time having to respond in posts like this what I am doing. --Blitzme99


 * I'm glad you responded, but you could have put the stuff above in the Server talk:Vashj US page. And it wouldn't kill you to put a comment in the edit summary field when you make a change. You should not expect people to be reading WoW realm forum posts about your server. I'm sorry, but your server is not that special. I will change you back to a suspect on the vandal list, but don't expect that you can make changes that might upset people without at least some explanation. It won't bother me an iota of you decide explanations are "wasting time".
 * You should say on Server:Vashj US page, that guilds are required to link or post evidence of boss kills to appear on the lists. --[[Image:gengar orange 22x22.png]] Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 7:14 PM PST 12 Aug 2008

I have now changed my updating policies to include a written explanation of reversing any changes that a user makes in my log as well as dropping them a line in thier private page. Thank you for showing me how to avoid future conflicts. --Blitzme99 14:47, 13 August 2008
 * Glad to hear it. You have done good work in making and keeping the Server:Vashj US page up to date and nice looking. If you get a chance, please include instructions for guild progression confirmation similar to what you put in the Vashj realm forum on the wiki page. You know, something like:
 * To confirm boss kills, please include screenshot links either on Server talk:Vashj US or at the The "Official" Vashj Guild progression thread on the WoW Vashj realm forum.
 * --[[Image:gengar orange 22x22.png]] Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 1:33 PM PST 13 Aug 2008

See User:Blitzme99/Vashj2 US for your sandbox page of Server:Vashj US. Do not recreate "Vashj2 US". 15:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I am trying to create a beta for WOTLK progression for my server. I was not aware of the server violations. won't happen again.

Template:Guildprogress 25 man wotlk
I moved your template to User:Blitzme99/Guildprogress 25 man wotlk, as its content doesn't match the name, and it's been under construction since September. I'm just trying to do a little bit of cleaning up of the Template namespace, to clear out stuff that's not really active or needed for global use. -- 21:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)