File talk:TuskarrFemale.JPG

Comments


Hahaha -- 10:28, 5 May 2007 (EDT)


 * Thank you Sir.-- 19:10, 5 May 2007 (EDT)

Can only admins vote?- 20:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Anyone can.-- 20:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Who ever said we need every silly picture? I did not. This is only one.-- 23:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Should we delete the other funny pictures on the site you humorless freaks?-- 20:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * It comes down to how many different funny pictures we want to host. I'd have no problem with a page that externally linked humorous images associated with wow, but we don't need to put all of them here do we? --Ilublawn 22:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * We do not have to host all of them, and I made this on WoWWiki first in responce to the below comment.-- 22:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I know right,I dont get it why it`s so bad, is it from the talk future race comment? 20:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, Swords of Oblivion said they could be 'some kinda exotic Eskimo hoola walrus on slimfast'-- 20:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

This is almost the only funny pic there is- 22:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * User:Adys,User:Kirkburn, and the Silly section.-- 22:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Answer me this: Would you put this in the encyclopedia? Dionyssios 01:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Do silly articles ever go into encyclopedias? Not that I can think of, unless its an ecyclopedia of humor... Wikipedia is different. If this goes we might as well remove all nonofficial category:silly material.Baggins 01:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Exactly!Theres nothing against it.- 05:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

How many votes untill one wins/loses?- 23:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I has to win by one for five days.-- 23:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Can you put images in your namespace?-- 20:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * If you mean put it in your user page, yes you are allowed to do that. It does not break any policy. Just as you are allowed to have a taco on your own page. BTW the fact that this has gone up for vote despite not breaking any policies, is infact really going against policy imo. Certain people have just turned it into a silly inquisition.Baggins 07:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I ment like 'Sandwichman slash this'. That doesn't work with images. At least I have not been able to.-- 23:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow,pretty intents voting for something that shouldnt even be voted for.-- 01:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Wait,so is not being voted for no more or what?-- 17:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * It was deemed a misuse of the voting process for something that wasn't eligible to voted on, as the image is not being used outside of talk pages and user:pages. Its not being used on any main articles, or for vandalism.Baggins 18:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)