Talk:Quest:The Light of Dawn

What is going on??
Wait, I though the DK players turned on the Scourge, therefore being against them. Then why are we supposed to fight the Argent Dawn for the Scourge?  Mr.X8  Talk Contribs  19:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If I understand the dialogue correctly, we're turned from the Scourge after the battle with the Argent Dawn. Hence the whole "screen blanks out/loading screen" thing. After this quest is done, we essentially become normal members of the Alliance and the Horde. (Well, normal members who can raise the dead, anyway.) --Joshmaul (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Will the Argent Dawn be permanantly hostile to us even after we've turned good again?  Mr.X8  Talk Contribs  03:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I think you're taking too simplistic a view of "good," here. Human Warlocks aren't really "good." Undead priests aren't really "good" (and in fact, lore-wise, shouldn't really be holy specced). What you are is opposed to the Lich King, and the Argent Crusade is in need of all the help it can get, so just as they're willing to accept the help of the Forsaken, they're also willing to accept the help of the Death Knights. -Deepone (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

The Argent Dawn NPCs in the instance turn friendly during the script event. There's a whole slew of quests available to death knights when they wake up in the non-instanced EPL... though they are just the regular quests we all did in our upper 50s way back when. -- k _d3 05:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Why did the Death Knights turn against the Scourge anyway? Shouldn't they already KNOW they mean nothing more to Arthas than any other Scourge soldier? Dsarker (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Your soul is returned to your body, and the Light of Dawn breaks the Lich King's mind control over you during the events of the battle, sometme between when the Corrupted Ashbringer refuses to obey Darion and when Darion orders you to stand down. - Ohten

Buried Beneath the Chapel
anyone know what they mean by that? I have an idea, but I'm not sure.Mack Attack (talk) 17:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

"Highlord Tirion Fordring says: Your master knows what lies beneath the chapel." -- I came to ask the same thing. 22:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I think the ground itself around Light's Hope is somehow blessed and significantly empowers the light/weakens the undead. When the battle is complete you see this big "beam" of light streatching into the skies. I presume it is related to whatever "lies beneath the ground". This could also explain how Light's Hope is still standing after years "alone" in scourge land, and how the Ashbringer could have turned on Darion and been purified in Tirion's grasp. That's my two cents, and it could be something copletely different. Perhaps it will be brought up again when the time for the final battle against the Lich King comes. 22:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I assumed it the glowing thingy was the 'Light of Dawn'. I have no clue to what it actually did.-- 22:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Upon doing the quest, I take back my connection between the glow, the Light of Dawn and the "lies beneath the chapel". I think it is a strong chance, but I am lost. If the objective completion means anything, the Light of Dawn is 'revealed' at the very end.-- 03:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I seriously think its a Naruu that got trapped on Azeroth, that would explain the Argents Dawns amazing victory over the Scourge attack during the quest. --Morec of Gilneas (talk) 20:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what lies beneath the chapel but one thing for sure and that is that we'll find out what it is before the end of wotlk. this is really interesting!Gargar (talk) 00:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry guys but I've been told this thousands of time and now I'm passing it down. The talk page of WoWWiki's pages are usually not forums.  Mr.X8  Talk Contribs  06:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Emotes
Some of the lines that were colored as emotes are just descriptions of what was going on at the time. Anyone have an in-game transcript with what is truly said? -- 00:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Only the followings are real emotes:
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 00:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The end of Alexandros the Ashbringer

 * emote
 * yell
 * emote
 * yell

Since this is chronogically the last appearence of Highlord Mograine, is not something to point out? --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 08:39, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * Does the part about the Lich King "siphoning" Alexandros actually have any basis in canon, or was it merely the transcriber's interpretation of the scene? I always thought the Lich King merely dispelled the vision, and his claim that "he's mine now" was merely a taunt rather than a literal statement of fact. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 08:50, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Good point. Perhaps this discussion is better on the Alexandros Mograine talk page, perhaps a forum? --N&#39;Nanz (talk) 08:59, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

The "The Lich King siphons Alexandros" part is not an emote in-game. I will change the article.-- 17:11, October 30, 2009 (UTC)