User talk:Stillfresh

Category:Instance Characters
Before I bug you about the topic at hand, I'd like to say your articles are well done.

The Instance Characters category has been deprecated. Mobs and NPCs should be put in the instance category where they live (&#91;&#91;Category:Instance:&lt;instance_name&gt;&#93;&#93;). -- Fandyllic (talk &middot; contr) 2:07 PM PDT 22 Mar 2007


 * Duly noted. I'll revise as I get the chance. Stillfresh 15:47, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

Thrash in karazhan
Just a small word, it's not because things are obsolete to the main raiding group, that others don't find it interesting.

The wiki is supposed to have ALL content, not just what the majority needs. So I ask you not to go deleting things which seems obsolete to you, if it adds to the page, it's important to stay. (there still are exceptions but instance thrash is not one of them ;) )

== Patrigan - Talk / Contr - SH (EU)  16:54, 10 April 2007 (EDT)


 * Only the link was deleted, no content was removed. Most of the content is duplicated in the individual monster entries themselves, as covered under the Encounters section of Karazhan. Stillfresh 10:51, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

Re: Terestian Illhoof
As it was worded, it seemed like more of a plug for druid OTs than any relevant part of a strategy. If it's a relevant strategy, you could explain how using a druid OT is beneficial (as compared to a warrior or pally OT). IMO, anyway. ;) RobertM525 06:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It's because a warrior or pally can't switch into uber DPS mode. The change in DPS for a feral druid going from bear to cat is much larger than a prot warrior trying to DPS. —Pzychotix (talk &middot; contr) 07:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll go back and add the comment, clarifying exactly why an OT druid is good for the role. Stillfresh 13:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)