Category talk:Demons

Introduction
I think the following paragraph is incorrect and should be removed.


 * "NOTE:Demons that belong in a clear subtype, such as Category:Nathrezim or Category:Succubi should be categorized accordingly, and should *not* be in this category."

The Succubi are demons and should be included in this page as well as the rest of them. It seems they already are counted under this category, so I suggest just removing the paragraph. Or the paragraph gets reworded slightly to indicate that specific succubi's should go under the relevant category (which would be common sense, so this paragraph just seems unnecessary). Chovynz (talk) 19:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Does it sound better now? I was working on cleaning up this category when I noticed your comment. I'm in the process of moving all articles to their specific subcategories, which is what this statement should refer to. -- 18:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah I think it's reworded fine now. Thanks. Not much else you can do to it really, is there? ;) After making the first comment I thought "Am I just being picky?" but I do think that positive sentences / directives are better understood, than negative directives. Proof is in the pudding; (the extended time it takes for people to read and follow the directives.) So the phrase can always be added in again if the new way doesnt work. Chovynz (talk) 03:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)