User talk:Askarmuk

Template
I reverted your changes to the template because these pages largely already had appropriate categorization on them. -- 16:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why? Haven't you seen a categories - "Warcraft III melee human units", "Warcraft III melee neutral units", "Warcraft III melee night elf units", "Warcraft III melee orc units", "Warcraft III melee undead units"? Why i cant sort units on them like this? (sry for bad english i'm poor in it) --Askarmuk (talk) 16:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Those categories were already on the pages the template was being applied to. -- 16:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1st - look at them: 111, 222, 333, 444, 555 - they are almost empty (last is an exception). --Askarmuk (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2nd - in all melee units's articles there is one unnecessary wider category - Category:Warcraft III melee units. My 1st wish was to remove it and replace it with right one (see above). Could you make me to remove it? --Askarmuk (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That would explain it, I only looked at human units. You should make the various categories subcategories of the melee units category and remove the "melee units" parent category from the individual pages. -- 16:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok i'll do my best. --Askarmuk (talk) 16:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Can i ask 1 more question? Must hight/blood elves and dwarves consider as humans? Maybe it is better to make one category for all Alliance units (like i did - Category:Warcraft III melee Alliance units), maybe its better make more subcategories (Category:Warcraft III melee dwarves, Category:Warcraft III melee hight elves, etc) or maybe we must do nothing? --Askarmuk (talk) 16:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm canceling this question because i found that eng version of WC3 talk much about human than Aliance in general. Thank you for talking. --Askarmuk (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Warcraft III
Hey, I see you're interested on working at the W3 articles. You should give this a look: User:Sandwichman2448/RTS units project, it's a project to work on it together. If you have any suggestion for the project, feel free to post there so all the members read about it.

To join, just open a new section at the talk page: User talk:Sandwichman2448/RTS units project.

No matter it seems inactive, I'm going to add some new topic soon :P.--Lon-ami (talk) 11:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * OK. I'll try to make some help. Just in case - my english is not very good :) --Askarmuk (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Doesn't matter, you'll be fine if you're only organizing and not writing extensive paragraphs. Any help is welcomed, and so far, you're doing a nice work (pandaren brewmaster, pit lord, etc).--Lon-ami (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I am open to the idea of revitalizing work on the RTS series. Any ideas towards an ideal (in theory, for now) final goal?-- 20:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm... Some time ago i thought about pop-ups for wc3-related objects like for WOW achievements, abilities, items, quests, etc. I think you know what i'm talking about, for example see the page Patch 4.0.6 - there are a lot of such links on it. --Askarmuk (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * And of course it will be good to see a good wc3-encyclopedia in wowpedia. --Askarmuk (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I say lets finish what we have, there's tons of empty or unfinished statistics articles.
 * Personally, I'm remaking heroes, units and buildings pages, or at least trying. Heroes looks pretty good so far: Warcraft III heroes. I'll have to make 2 new images for neutral and campaign heroes (I'm classifying them by class/rank, not by model, so the likes of Jaina and Malfurion don't appear no matter they're different).
 * Also, there's like 4 pages, and I would like to merge them all into a single one for the description of what a hero is (then we'll have a list for each of the 3 games).--Lon-ami (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)