Template talk:Source-article

I wonder if this template should be upgraded and get used on pages like the three Bestiarys, which currently use their own non-templated warning. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?-- 05:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It probably should... this template is not being used currently anyway. 05:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there any way to see which pages use this template?--Ashbear160 (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The What Links here link. 04:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * So Pcj is deleting the articles with this tag, what do we do? We kind of need them.--Ashbear160 (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * They were copyright violations. Please see the copyright policy.-- 17:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * So we should delete all source articles? and leave a lot of dead sources? is that it?...--Ashbear160 (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I never said that. The question is of what is too much. Coobra said "I didn't know about the Wayback Machine, so finding replacements is not that big a deal..." and I agree with that, but if you really want to continue, talk to Pcj about wiki standards.-- 18:28, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Then why are the bestiaries ok? and the troll compendium not?, maybe if a admin asked for permission in the blizzard story forums this would probably be a lot easier(if blizzard actually bothered to answer).--Ashbear160 (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)