Template talk:Outdated

New version
just a proposal, and i dunno if you saw my i-note test template or not. but how about this?

I don't really see the point in adding may or article(especially this, as it's an inline template, not for use on whole articles, just sections). -- Zeal  talk   contr  web 08:22, 23 January 2007 (EST)
 * Sure, changed.-- Hobinheim  ( talk ·  contr ) 09:55, 23 January 2007 (EST)

Broken?
When I add the OOD tag to a section, it will not allow it to be on its own line. See Blacksmithing proficiencies. RobertM525 04:01, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Radical Changes
Seeing as this template has reverted back to an article scope and now uses Ambox can someone update the documentation to reflect it's no longer used for sections nor to behaves as it did previously (inline) and remove the mention of it being based on my inote design. :/ --  http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_zeal.png|User:Zeal  http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_talk.png|User talk:Zeal  http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_contribs.png|Special:Contributions/Zeal  http://www.zealvurte.co.uk/temp/sig-av/wiki_end.png|User:Zeal  11:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Good point - tweaked. Note that this design also has a reason input. 18:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Problem with reason and elinks
But just remove the elink, and it's fine.. I really don't know why that is.

Probably a simple fix I'm just not seeing. Can anyone help? Thanks! 4:48 PM, 9 Jun 2009 (EDT)


 * The link URL contains =, which causes the parser to think that you're trying to pass a named parameter. Use explicit syntax to avoid that. -- foxlit (talk) 18:11, December 30, 2009 (UTC)