Talk:Balnazzar

Profile image
Whilst I value artwork more highly than screenshots, I do not think the comic image of Balnazzar is appropriate as a profile image: his body takes up barely a sixth of the image, his face is entirely obscured and he is heavily shrouded in darkness. If a good image of his face appears in the comics, then it should certainly be made his profile picture; but for now I suggest the original game image be returned to the profile. Any objections? -- 17:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Tactis Page
This Article needs to be seperated, one a lore page and the other a Tactics page. Anyone agree?--Maelstrong 18:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello? this article needs to be cleaned and needs to be seperated, Lore page and Tactics page just like all other bosses(not faction leaders of course). This way his loot table can be shown as well.--Maelstrong 22:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Incase you haven't noticed, his loot table IS shown. And no, it doesn't need to be cleaned up. The tactics and lore sections are quite organized. Now, if the page is going to be separated into lore/strategy is up the the admins. Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 22:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

well duh, i have noticed the loot table is shown, and dur dur dur of course its up to the admin, I'm just sick and tired of seeing the tactics and when trying to read the article.--Maelstrong 22:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Well then, don't go to the section called "The Fight". That's usually a sign of TACTICS. Oh, and also, why are you saying it NEEDS to be cleaned if it's YOUR personal preference? If the pages were changed just to fit every indivual person's tastes, pages would likely be changed about five times a minute, every minute. Unless the admins decide to do it, it isn't happening. Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 23:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Heck, why are you even reading the Tactics part if you wanna see the Lore part? The Lore is all put in the TOP, and the Tactics are on the BOTTOM. I'm not sure how you read, but it sure doesn't seem like the most convienent way. Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 23:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey don't be that rude Toran Wildpaw, he is just asking to move the tactics to it's own page (which may be correct) as most of the bosses, just look at this category and even there are more that hadn't been add to the category, for example: Lady Vashj (tactics). Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 00:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well I don't see a Rend Blackhand (Tactics) page, or a Drek'thar (tactics) page. Infact, they are both sorted the same way as this one is; lore on top, tactics on bottom. And nobody has complained about it in all the time the Rend Blackhand and Drek'thar articles have existed. I also notice a lack of tactics pages of city leaders; and don't give me that crap about them being city leaders. If you need special tactics for them, then make a tactics page for them. Otherwise you're just being hypocritical. Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 00:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Wait, wait, wait, I didn't invent the rules... I just follow the formats of the pages, most of the times the bosses have their tactics page and the city leaders I think never have tactics page, just look what an admin do, he deleted the tactics page of Cairne. About the Rend's article is as you say...nobody has complained and maybe that's why they haven't been split, because nobody has taken the time to split them. Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well then complain about it to the admins. Because as far as I see, expecting us to keep other bosses split between tactics and lore and not having faction leaders split is just being hypocritical. Toran Wildpaw of the Frenzyheart (talk) 01:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Name
Is he named for Belshazzar, perhaps?  Xavius, the Satyr Lord  21:54, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I doubt it. Blizzard usually much more obvious about name references, and the two have almost nothing in common. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 22:22, January 22, 2010 (UTC)