Talk:Horde bias

Even though this is supposedly a silly article, I don't think it belongs here. QQ belongs on the forums. Copperblast (talk) 02:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it wasn't necessarily intended to be QQ as much as making fun of QQ. I thought it was keeping in the spirit of some of Wowpedia's other pages like People in your Raid - but maybe like those pages it loses its humour after a few dozen edits. I don't know, no one objected when I made a thread on the Wowpedia forum. --Bellocois (talk) 02:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * NO THIS PAGE IS AWESOME, LET IT BE--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Should we at least make a counterpart that makes an attempt at an objective analysis... or clarify some of the things here that are just... wrong? Sarm3 (talk) 02:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * NO, i mean if you think a silly page needs objective analysis ask a admin--Ashbear160 (talk) 02:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * *Looms ominously* -- 03:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I suspect an earlier version of the page was funnier than the present one. I added the NPOV tag because I don't think there's a tag for "Some of the things on this page do not adhere to the silly label. They are simply stupid." --Espantish (talk) 04:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And who are you to make such a sweeping judgment? It's not meant to be objective, and it's not supposed to be intelligent. It's a silly page, silly. --[[Image:IconSmall_Deathwing.gif]] Joshmaul, Loremaster of Chaos (Leave a Message) 09:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

We need order
People is starting to take this too seriously. Mods, please, explain to them what's a silly page, they don't seem to understand it >_<.--Lon-ami (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Creating an Alliance bias article is fine. The whining goes both ways.  Don't get mad at each other just because creating the article ruined your joke. -- 23:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I was trying to be funny at the end but he clearly can't take a joke i even did same in the alliance bias article...--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Bah you're taking all the fun out of this--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Banish this page to the dregs of WoWWiki. Fanta (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * BUH--Ashbear160 (talk) 01:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm personally in favor of simply deleting both faction bias articles entirely. The entire concept has gone way beyond "silly" and fully into bickering and complaining, something which surprises me not one bit after reading the official forums for any length of time. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with ya. Silly articles are meant to fun and amusing, not places where people constantly bicker and complain. --Sairez (talk) 21:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It only turned to bicker and complaints when someone started making the alliance bias article--Ashbear160 (talk) 00:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it turns into bickering, pissing and moaning because people love to whine. This page was made for joking, but because of human nature, people used it to vent their whining. "It only turned to bicker and complaints when someone started making the alliance bias article" is obviously a biased statement on its own. You're adding to the amount of QQ. I don't think the page should be removed, just well guarded. There are plenty who I'm sure already are, and if someone keeps over stepping boundaries, lock them or something. Prevent them from continuing. Myrlen Midnightstar (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know it's particularly well guarded, but the wiki polices itself in theory. I'm still amused at how popular it ended up being, though I guess I shouldn't act so shocked. --Bellocois (talk) 09:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)