Category talk:Makrura tribes

/sighs No matter what I do, it links to  instead of , and it circ reference to Category:Makrura tribes :( Someone able to fix this please? TherasTaneel (talk) 13:15, April 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Solved :) the "name" option has to bee the article name
 * 13:27, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yay! :) well, then we just need to get rid of the circ reference on the Category:Makrura tribes page. TherasTaneel (talk) 13:30, April 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * The Bogstrok aren't a tribe though... 17:30, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * How do we know? "Common bogstrok" then, like on the murloc template? TherasTaneel (talk) 17:54, April 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * If that's how we want to handle it. Cause Blizz tends to name the first time a creature is encountered by their race name... then other times by a group name. The murlocs, ravagers, the gorlocs ... least it seems to be a trend they do... and with the bogstrok, they only appear in one small area, so they never had the chance to give them group names. 18:26, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * So...do We have any opinion on how to name them other than "Common bogstrok" in the template? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:11, April 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Personally, I'd rather not create another article for them that would basically have nothing but duplicate information from their race page. You can leave it as is... I just wanted to say that they weren't a named group. 19:16, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh quite right,...for now it's just an "Ooh, shiny!"-effect for those who'd like to know more of those troublesome but delicious creatures (with just a pinch of lemon, slurp!) TherasTaneel (talk) 19:21, April 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * ... Now I'm hungry... thanks. 19:23, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, mouthwatering...isn't it. (Don't run! We are your friends!) TherasTaneel (talk) 01:29, April 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Do we even know if the makrura are in anyway related to the bogstrok--Ashbear160 (talk) 10:47, July 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Kliklak. 19:58, July 18, 2010 (UTC)