Talk:Retcon

Major overhaul
I think this article requires a major overhaul. First of all, why is this article named "Retcon speculation" instead of simply "retcon", and why is it speculation if the information is just explaining what a retcon is or something said by Chris Metzen himself ("Metzen on continuity" section). Also why are there two articles for retcons instead of just one?

I think they should be merged and renamed "Retcon speculation", while this one simply "retcon". Remove the speculation tag from this article.

Also I noticed that parts of both retcons articles are outdated or had repeated information, I tried to clean them up, but I would prefer to merge them first before I continue. Any thoughts? Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 20:37, November 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * Then, I'll proceed if no one is opposed. Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 00:53, November 30, 2009 (UTC)