User talk:Auron

History Table
Believe me that I am concious that the history table exists, but do you think a reader will read all the versions in the history section? I am not angry for your revert nor I am looking for fighting, but I want to tell you that in this wiki when something is removed from WoW we put in the article that it used to be some way but it was changed/removed ;) Benitoperezgaldos (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's edited very very poorly, like the update notes are added as an afterthought. The first thing a reader sees in that note is "you need a flying mount." It doesn't even say it historically, such as "before patch whatever, you needed a flying mount, but now there's a summoning stone." It just contradicts itself. "You need a flying mount. No wait, I was kidding, you don't." It's just poorly phrased and formatted, and I've seen it all over :/ If the point is to make it a historical note, it needs to be rewritten to be a historical note. - Auron 21:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion is desired
Hey, we're pretty much settled on leaving Wikia, but I wanted to see if you had any input. Thanks. -- 00:28, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is that a template or just a copypaste run? - Auron 02:44, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Copy and paste. Sorry to bother, just thought you would want to know. -- 02:45, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah, I agree with it. I'm moving PvX to curse, and GWiki is finding private hosting. Wikia's forsaking any serious wiki in favor of a bunch of small casual ones, so on their head be it. - Auron 02:52, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, seriously. WoWWiki doesn't seem to care about encyclopedic wikis anymore. -- 12:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)