Talk:Trade Prince Gallywix/The Future of Gallywix

All the Citations are ingame and a huge part of the Goblin starting zone
Putting citation needed just makes the article ridiculous especially when they're a huge part of the starting zone's plot. Even the article by Rosenberg. mentions all of those events. Copperblast (talk) 16:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) A statement that says he is "truly and completely hated by all other members of the Horde" needs a citation. However the whole statement made by the guy might as well be removed as it's just what one guy think. What makes him so notable?
 * 2) The quest you gave as a source for him being a traitor doesn't say anything that he is a traitor.
 * 3) What does the things he's done make him incompatible as a Trade Prince? After all, the article mentions that trade princes "will stop at nothing to amass their fortunes and power, whether through legitimate means or via black markets and treachery", and that they even "killed, blackmailed and schemed their way to the top."
 * I'm looking forward to hearing from you. -- 17:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * He's somewhat affiliated with the Warcraft TCG.
 * The player kills his girlfriend for working for the Trade Prince and Sassy Hardwrench says at the end "It gives me the shivers to think that she might have kissed that monster!".
 * He betrayed everyone around him and most importantly lost out to the player in both cunning, popularity, and power. Copperblast (talk) 17:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Still doesn't mean "this guy's opinions is what is the truth".
 * Still says nothing about being a traitor.
 * Still doesn't mean that he is incompatible of being a Trade Trade (and possibly racial leader). If you even look at the end, he says "all Trade Princes are about as corrupt and greedy as Gallywix." Said by the same Mark Rosenberg. -- 17:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Its alot for a speculation article. Keep in mind Wowpedia already has articles like Blood elf controversy, Darkspear trolls controversy, and Draenei controversy among others.
 * Sassy just called him a monster, how much more do you want?
 * Gallywix showed as ineffectual, the player was going to replace him on Kezan and on the Lost Isles they repeatedly showed they were his better. Copperblast (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * They have arguments for all of them and citations. This one doesn't.
 * Monster != traitor. Know the difference.
 * Still doesn't make him incompatible as he is. -- 17:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * None of those have even half the citations this page does. Most of those citations aren't even player or npc reactions.
 * In addition to referring to Gallywix as a monster(a term of extreme disgust of loathing), they considered Chip and Sassy traitors for siding with him.
 * It shows he isn't cunning enough to be the ruler of the goblins as they outdid him, showing he was the inferior. Copperblast (talk) 20:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Just cite the statements.-- 21:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)