User talk:Dom1nate

Response
I agree. My initial problem with all of this was the simple fact that he deleted the original 11/28/22 build and replaced it with his build. Honestly, I am not super pro at Wikia stuff and didn't even thing to check the discussion area. I was trying to clean out or clean up all the random builds, by either deleting or revising. I kept changing his build back to 11/28/22. So in the end, it wasn't 1 guy putting up a bunch of trash builds as I thought, but 1 guy trying to preserve his build and reverting all the garbage back into place because I edited his build. He called it vandalism, but I laugh at that.

I don't think he's going to be happy unless he gets his way. Based on his waffling, change of verbiage, hypocrisy and lack of anything other than a spreadsheet he can't seem to use, I don't think he really knows what he's doing. It is pretty clear that he has issues understanding the mechanics based on his initial assault of "11/21/29 is better than combat at low levels". Check my page for that abortion. He's obviously changed his tune now based on his more recent comments.0

At the end of the day, I just don't want there to be trash builds, because I'd actually like to point people here when they ask. Right now, it's a joke if you mention someone going to wowwiki to look at builds. -- Hoochfly 23:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

His definition of "obsolete" could definitely be part of the problem and I don't think I've ever disagreed with your sentiment, I just wanted to be clear for people looking up builds. I remember that API, some priest on the rogue forums made it. It took us a few days to get it right because he used the hemo formula from Wowwiki, which was wrong at the time, but after that it was quite good.

As for NES and Tecmo Super Bowl...wow...blast from the past. We lived on that game in college. Bo Jackson was unstoppable as was Christian Okoye. -- Hoochfly 23:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)