Template talk:Humans

I have been trying to create a Human Nation navigation template at my own user page at "User:Voidvector/Sandbox". The version I envisioned is more informative (e.g. including when they were formed). However, after playing with it, I can't get it to look good, so I am posting this generic template for now. Please feel free to critique and edit the Sandbox template at my user sandbox page listed above. --Voidvector 02:21, 26 December 2006 (EST)

Wastewander and grizzly hill trappers
Should these be included? i mean the first is a group of nomads and the second a groupd of communities in grizzly hills, but they fit the bill of these type of templates.--Ashbear160 (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Nations != small organizations. Of course not.--Lon-ami (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * the problem is that this is the like the other template like this one which include that type of groups(i just call them ethnic groups). a common standard needs to be found for this type of template.--Ashbear160 (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Template title is Human nations, not human organizations.--Lon-ami (talk) 15:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Such things are fluid, but the point of things need to be remembered. A few human groups are anomalies, but I don't know about adding them.-- 21:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * That's why i started a discussion to try to establish some common standards to these types of templates, so far nobody answered.--Ashbear160 (talk) 21:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * "Nobody answered" doesn't always mean "do it anyway." -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 22:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)