Category talk:Bind on Equip socketable gems

This category is not only a misnomer (gems are not bind on equip) but is probably unneeded; the vast majority of gems are not BoP, and I see no reason to have a category for those that aren't. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 18:51, June 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * By counts, BoP gems account for 20% of the total number of gems. I would hesitate to call 80% "vast".  Besides, relative quantity is not a good argument.  A better argument, IMO, would be "is this category useful?"  As is, it serves as foil for the BoP gems category: any gem belongs in one or the other category.  Useful for symmetry (thus maybe to automation). --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 18:10, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would certainly question whether this category is useful; the opposite of BoP is not BoE, because there are many items in the game (such as gems) that do not bind at all, not to mention account or use-bound items. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 23:49, 8 June 2011 (UTC)