Talk:Scarlet Onslaught

So what, are they going to be friendly, neutral, or hostile?  Mr.X8  Talk Contribs  21:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Maybe they redeemed themselves and will be friendly but at the same time the size of that town in the fly by video leads me to believe they are hostile unless Blizzard is making them have one rather large town (or there will be good and bad Scarlet Onslaught people). Bornakk on the official forums just added to the speculation. http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=5284851002&pageNo=1&sid=1#6 Leviathon 00:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * They're called the Scarlet Onslaught. That's never a good sign. Xavius, the Satyr Lord 16:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The word Onslaught itself has nothing to do with their position against other players, but has everything to do with their new tactical position towards the Scourge. The Onslaught they plan to make is against the Scourge, so this can be interpreted as a very good thing. Saroumane 7:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * See, now it would seem that they are hostile anyway. Never ever trust an Onslaught. Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 08:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Has anyone noticed this? new Scarlet place in Icecrown?
http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/wotlk/sandboxshots/icecrown/icecrown_51.jpg

Is it possible this screenshot means that there will be a friendly Scarlet Crusade faction afterall, since that shot looks small, much smaller then Hearthglen or New Hearthglen.

Perhaps the same way you prove that Akama is not with Illidan you have to prove the Scarlets are no longer controlled by Balnazzar?

--


 * Well consider these quests: and, want us to kill the leader there I doubt these scarlets are any different. If fact the leader is used to live in EPL, till death knights took over Tyr's Hand.  20:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)